Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorIrving, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorVincent, Ian J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-26T21:08:06Z
dc.date.available2014-05-26T21:08:06Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-12
dc.identifier.issn2230-6277
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/2416
dc.description.abstractExpertise in the ‘Nature-isation’ of urban environments marks an important shift in 21st Century urbanism. In a scramble to rebrand urban design as “sustainable” and “green”, Landscape Architects have attempted to claim the territory wholesale, pointing to a clear link between “Landscape” and “Nature”. Yet, John May’s (2008) critique of a major contemporary project of landscape architecture, Fresh Kills Park, is a significant challenge to this claim. Here, May contests the underpinning values of design in the context of a hidden social and political ideology.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.subjectStaten Island (New York)en_NZ
dc.subjectNew Yorken_NZ
dc.subjectlandfillsen_NZ
dc.subjectremodelingen_NZ
dc.subjectenvironmental designen_NZ
dc.subjectpraxeologyen_NZ
dc.subjectlandscape architecture theoryen_NZ
dc.titleThe ethics of place-making : how landscapes lieen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.rights.holderDaniel Irvingen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden120107 Landscape Architectureen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIrving, D. (2013). The ethics of place-making : how landscapes lie. X-Section Journal. November. (no pagination)en_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.publication.spageunpageden_NZ
unitec.publication.lpageunpageden_NZ
unitec.publication.volume3en_NZ
unitec.publication.titlexsectionen_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUrban Logic Ltd (Hong Kong, China)en_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaLandscape Architecture


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record


© Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142