dc.contributor.author | Gremillion, Helen | |
dc.contributor.author | Tolich, Martin | |
dc.contributor.author | Bathurst, Ralph | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-07T22:20:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-07T22:20:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10652/3146 | |
dc.description.abstract | Unique situation in NZ: in the wake of the 1988 Cartwright Inquiry (extreme abuse of medical power in research), 50% of committee composition is lay.
Keep in check researcher and institutional power
Also, power to the “ordinary New Zealander” (layperson)
This research project: experiences of lay members (so, internal to committee process)
Across five ethics committees in NZ, lay members are empowered, fully valued members
In sharp contrast to the North American experience: limited grammarian roles and often alienated, if not intimidated in cttee
Yet, ambiguity of lay role, particularly in tertiary committees: who is a ‘lay’ person? (on Health and Disability Ethics Committees [HDECs], clearer: ‘non-medical’). What or whom do they represent in tertiary contexts? | en_NZ |
dc.language.iso | en | en_NZ |
dc.relation.uri | http://cead.org.nz/Site/Ethnography_conference/CEAD_archives.aspx | en_NZ |
dc.rights | All rights reserved | en_NZ |
dc.subject | research ethics committees | en_NZ |
dc.subject | lay member experiences | en_NZ |
dc.subject | lay persons | en_NZ |
dc.subject | lay roles | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Health and Disability Ethics Committees [HDECs] | en_NZ |
dc.subject | New Zealand | en_NZ |
dc.subject | North America | en_NZ |
dc.subject | New Zealand. Committee of Inquiry into Allegations concerning the Treatment of Cervical Cancer at National Women's Hospital and into other related matters. | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Cartwright Inquiry 1987-1988 (N.Z.) | en_NZ |
dc.title | ‘Lay’ roles on research ethics committees : North American vs. New Zealand experiences | en_NZ |
dc.type | Conference Contribution - Oral Presentation | en_NZ |
dc.subject.marsden | 220107 Professional Ethics (incl. police and research ethics) | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Gremillion, H., Tolich, M., and Bathurst, R. (2014). ‘Lay’ roles on research ethics committees : North American vs. New Zealand experiences. Paper presented at Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines conference, University of Waikato, Hamilton, 26-28 November. | en_NZ |
unitec.institution | Unitec Institute of Technology | en_NZ |
unitec.institution | University of Otago | en_NZ |
unitec.institution | Massey University | en_NZ |
unitec.conference.title | Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines conference | en_NZ |
unitec.conference.org | Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines (CEAD) | en_NZ |
unitec.conference.location | University of Waikato, Hamilton | en_NZ |
unitec.conference.sdate | 2014-11-27 | |
unitec.conference.edate | 2014-11-28 | |
unitec.peerreviewed | yes | en_NZ |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Unitec Institute of Technology | en_NZ |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Otago | en_NZ |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Massey University | en_NZ |
unitec.identifier.roms | 57020 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-9219-2366 | en_NZ |
unitec.institution.studyarea | Social Practice | |