Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorGremillion, Helen
dc.contributor.authorTolich, Martin
dc.contributor.authorBathurst, Ralph
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:20:50Z
dc.date.available2015-12-07T22:20:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/3146
dc.description.abstractUnique situation in NZ: in the wake of the 1988 Cartwright Inquiry (extreme abuse of medical power in research), 50% of committee composition is lay. Keep in check researcher and institutional power Also, power to the “ordinary New Zealander” (layperson) This research project: experiences of lay members (so, internal to committee process) Across five ethics committees in NZ, lay members are empowered, fully valued members In sharp contrast to the North American experience: limited grammarian roles and often alienated, if not intimidated in cttee Yet, ambiguity of lay role, particularly in tertiary committees: who is a ‘lay’ person? (on Health and Disability Ethics Committees [HDECs], clearer: ‘non-medical’). What or whom do they represent in tertiary contexts?en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://cead.org.nz/Site/Ethnography_conference/CEAD_archives.aspxen_NZ
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden_NZ
dc.subjectresearch ethics committeesen_NZ
dc.subjectlay member experiencesen_NZ
dc.subjectlay personsen_NZ
dc.subjectlay rolesen_NZ
dc.subjectHealth and Disability Ethics Committees [HDECs]en_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectNorth Americaen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealand. Committee of Inquiry into Allegations concerning the Treatment of Cervical Cancer at National Women's Hospital and into other related matters.en_NZ
dc.subjectCartwright Inquiry 1987-1988 (N.Z.)en_NZ
dc.title‘Lay’ roles on research ethics committees : North American vs. New Zealand experiencesen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution - Oral Presentationen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden220107 Professional Ethics (incl. police and research ethics)en_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGremillion, H., Tolich, M., and Bathurst, R. (2014). ‘Lay’ roles on research ethics committees : North American vs. New Zealand experiences. Paper presented at Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines conference, University of Waikato, Hamilton, 26-28 November.en_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.institutionUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
unitec.institutionMassey Universityen_NZ
unitec.conference.titleContemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines conferenceen_NZ
unitec.conference.orgContemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines (CEAD)en_NZ
unitec.conference.locationUniversity of Waikato, Hamiltonen_NZ
unitec.conference.sdate2014-11-27
unitec.conference.edate2014-11-28
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
dc.contributor.affiliationMassey Universityen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms57020en_NZ
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9219-2366en_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaSocial Practice


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record