In the context of mobility, social identity and belonging, where is ‘community’ – and why does it matter?
Fagan, Karen M.
Citation:Fagan, K.M. (2016). In the Context of Mobility, Social Identity and Belonging, Where is ‘Community’ and Why Does It Matter? Whanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Development, 2(1), 8-18. Unitec Institute of Technology. Unitec ePress. Retrieved from: http://www.unitec.ac.nz/epress
Permanent link to Research Bank record:https://hdl.handle.net/10652/3558
The word ‘community’ is used in many diverse situations. It may be that we move into a geographical community, buy into a product community, are part of a shared interest community, participate in a work or student community, belong to a cultural or lifestyle community, or are perhaps put into a community by those around us. Whatever the situation, the word community comes with a range of assumptions. If we are interested in working alongside communities, it is essential that we take some time to reflect on the value of belonging to communities, and the location of longer-term communities in today’s neo-liberal context. This is particularly relevant in Aotearoa New Zealand today within the currents of individualism, consumerism, globalisation and mobility. Responsible involvement in community development, particularly in the provinces, requires ongoing engagement with the concept of ‘community’, including some of the underpinning values and beliefs that inform people’s perceptions of ‘community’. It has been well argued that proactively building a sense of community increases participation and contributes to a sense of individual and social identity, along with a sense of belonging. However, if these communities do not have a firm foundation over time, what might be the impact on individual, community and societal wellbeing? This question is explored within the context of today’s neo-liberal mobile society, with a particular reference to the social institution of schools, and residential-based communities. As a part of this, the use of place-based community consultations as a strategy for community participation is critiqued.
Keywords:community development, neoliberalism, New Zealand
ANZSRC Field of Research:111708 Health and Community Services
Copyright Holder:Unitec ePress
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand
Copyright Notice:Whanake: The Pacific Journal of Community Development is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rights:This digital work is protected by copyright. It may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use. These documents or images may be used for research or private study purposes. Whether they can be used for any other purpose depends upon the Copyright Notice above. You will recognise the author's and publishers rights and give due acknowledgement where appropriate.
MetadataShow detailed record
This item appears in
The following license files are associated with this item: