• Login
    View Item 
    •   Research Bank Home
    • Unitec Institute of Technology
    • Study Areas
    • Osteopathy
    • Osteopathy Dissertations and Theses
    • View Item
    •   Research Bank Home
    • Unitec Institute of Technology
    • Study Areas
    • Osteopathy
    • Osteopathy Dissertations and Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Validity of retrospective patient reported assessment of pre-surgical hip pain and disability following hip arthroscopy

    Wain, Matthew Joel Thomas

    Thumbnail
    Share
    View fulltext online
    MOst_2021_Matthew Wain +.pdf (2.083Mb)
    Date
    2021
    Citation:
    Wain, M. J. T. (2021). Validity of retrospective patient reported assessment of pre-surgical hip pain and disability following hip arthroscopy. (Unpublished document submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Osteopathy). Unitec Institute of Technology, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10652/5364
    Permanent link to Research Bank record:
    https://hdl.handle.net/10652/5364
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of pre-surgery PROMS completed retrospectively 6 and 24 months after hip arthroscopy compared with prospective completion. Validity was judged in relation to preoperative test-retest reliability. METHODS: Three separate groups of hip arthroscopy patients were recruited. In two retrospective groups, patients who had undergone a hip arthroscopy and had completed preoperative PROM questionnaires were contacted 6 or 24 months after surgery and asked to recall their preoperative state. In a third test-retest group, patients completed prospective PROMs twice prior to surgery, 2–8 weeks apart. PROMs included Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAH), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (HOOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT- 12), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Medical Care, Feeling and Pain. RESULTS: In the 6-month, 24-month and test-retest groups, patient sample sizes were 52, 40 and 61, respectively. Retrospective 6- and 24-month and test-retest PROMs demonstrated ‘moderate’ to ‘very large’ correlations (ICC=0.42–0.79), except for 6-month VAS-Medical- Care and VAS-Feeling (‘small’) and 24-month VAS-Feeling (‘trivial’). PROMs for the 24- month group reduced, from prospective to retrospective, for NAH-Total (MD -4.10 [-7.93–- 0.27; (95%CI)]; p=0.03), HOOS Symptoms (-8.21 [-13.44–-2.97]; p=0.003), HOOS-Daily- Living (-7.53 [-12.71–-2.36]; p=0.005), HOOS-Sports (-6.49 [-12.97–0.00]; p=0.05), and HOOS-Short-Form (-5.16 [-9.83–-0.49]; p=0.03). Similar non-significant reductions were observed for 6-month retrospective PROMs, except for VAS-Feeling which increased retrospectively (7.47 [0.13–14.81]; p=0.05). Three test-retest PROMs also showed statistically significant reduction, with worse outcomes approaching surgery: HOOS-Daily- Living (-.3.87 [-7.73–0.00]; p=0.05), HOOS-Short-Form (-4.49 [-8.41–-0.53]; p=0.03), and IHOT-12-Total (-4.91 [-8.7–-1.23]; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Correlations for retrospective versus prospective PROM scores spanned a similar range to test-retest correlations. Therefore, PROM scores relating to pre-surgery condition, but completed 6 or 24 months after surgery, showed agreement with PROM scores completed before surgery which were consistent with the day-to-day variability expected before surgery. This consistency supports the use of retrospective PROMs completed up to 2 years after hip arthroscopy.
    Keywords:
    Auckland (N.Z.), New Zealand, hip arthroscopy patients, hip arthroscopy, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), hip surgery, osteopathic medicine, arthroscopy, patients
    ANZSRC Field of Research:
    110499 Complementary and Alternative Medicine not elsewhere classified
    Degree:
    Master of Osteopathy, Unitec Institute of Technology
    Supervisors:
    Bacon, Catherine; Furness, James
    Copyright Holder:
    Author

    Copyright Notice:
    All rights reserved
    Rights:
    This digital work is protected by copyright. It may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use. These documents or images may be used for research or private study purposes. Whether they can be used for any other purpose depends upon the Copyright Notice above. You will recognise the author's and publishers rights and give due acknowledgement where appropriate.
    Metadata
    Show detailed record
    This item appears in
    • Osteopathy Dissertations and Theses [208]

    Te Pūkenga

    Research Bank is part of Te Pūkenga - New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology

    • About Te Pūkenga
    • Privacy Notice

    Copyright ©2022 Te Pūkenga

    Usage

    Downloads, last 12 months
    52
     
     

    Usage Statistics

    For this itemFor the Research Bank

    Share

    About

    About Research BankContact us

    Help for authors  

    How to add research

    Register for updates  

    LoginRegister

    Browse Research Bank  

    EverywhereInstitutionsStudy AreaAuthorDateSubjectTitleType of researchSupervisorCollaboratorThis CollectionStudy AreaAuthorDateSubjectTitleType of researchSupervisorCollaborator

    Te Pūkenga

    Research Bank is part of Te Pūkenga - New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology

    • About Te Pūkenga
    • Privacy Notice

    Copyright ©2022 Te Pūkenga